Skip to main content

Bay me, Pay me, Say me

I've stayed quiet on the eBay purchase of Skype until the dust settles a little bit.

I have to say I still don't understand the logic behind the purchase. Skype was on the bleeding edge but had begun to lose focus, the more recent updates were fuzzy and didn't really bring any additional value to the product.

In hindsight you might say that the offering was already attractive to a buyer so why bother. The momentum will now shift to Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to finish what Skype started and leverage the presence aspect with tangible business benefit.

So why did eBay step up and pay out?

One statement suggests that it was a way to break in to untapped markets, South East Asia and China. An area where eBay has not really been successful.

It would appear that the plan was to piggy back off of Skype usage and expand the foot print of services offered, this would include PayPal. In the recent past I have tried to create a PayPal account here in Thailand. When I tired to do so Thailand as a country for account registration was not an option, US and Europe centric the choices were.

There is a more real stopper to the use of PayPal and eBay in the region and that is, with the exception of Singapore and Hong Kong, a distrust of any form of electronic money. Direct Debit is not widely accepted as a payment choice. Credit and Debit cards carry a standard 3.5% usage charge. Cash is King in the Land of Smiles, and elsewhere in the region.

Go to any bank at the end of the month and you will be faced with queues of people lining up to settle utilities and other bills (after queuing up to withdraw the cash from an ATM).

This is the problem that eBay needs to solve if it wishes to grow in this market space, buying a VoIP solution will not help massively, credibility of ePayment.

If the dream is to have one convenient platform where people can browse eBay, pay via PayPal and have a cheap phone call between seller and buyer, it might be some time before that dream is realised.

And what will happen to Skype now? which parts of the roadmap that others would like to see will evolve? or will the usual suspects surge and fill the gaps.

I anticipate the latter rather then the former.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crisis Connections

What the flood situation in Thailand has shown once again is the power of social networks to fill the void of communication. In recent times the role of Facebook, Twitter, and Blackberry messenger has been shown in good and bad light.  The same methods that released the Arab Spring have also been used to coordinate the London Riots . Love them or loathe social networks are here to stay and what the floods show is how they keep people connected.  Some will say there should be no communication void if central government is on top of its game, but with a situation that can change so rapidly, and over such a large area the traditional press certainly struggle to keep the public up to date. Twitter and Facebook have been saviours for those of us outside Thailand at this time.  With roving reporters and connected people like Patee Sarasin and Jetrin out doing and tweeting many more people are kept up to date. Equally useful is the ability to time shift news updates through TV ch

Voice puts the pinch on Content

Content providers in Thailand are struggling to stay afloat after a restructuring of the revenue sharing between the mobile operators and themselves. Firms like Advanced Info Service (AIS) have been offering content on their 2.5G networks here for sometime. This has spawned a number of content partners to spring up. The previous arrangement were of the order of 65% to 80%. The new arrangement sets a 50:50 split of the revenue between proivder and operator. The operators say that this is due to the operating costs of their networks and that up to now this has been a trial offering. It smells more like a knee jerk reaction to falling revenues from voice. When will the market wake up and realize that paying for voice is dead. The secret to the success of operators going forward will be in the successful channeling of content, where voice is but another type of content. This is a worrying trend. If the pinch continues then I see that most of the content partners will not survive long. This

SKY New Zealand vaults into the 21st Century

New Zealand is a pretty country but it's also pretty slow in coming forward in many areas. It has it fair share of innovation but some parts of everyday life are still if not 20 years behind but at least 10...until now. Sky in the UK has made use of user driven options through handset interaction for some time, push the red button, Sky NZ still does not support this type of service. But this is where competition shows its value, it forces natural monopolies to innovate, and let's be honest Sky TV is a natural monopoly here by being the only digital TV service (which you have to use if you want to get a decent reception so Freeview doesn't count [yet]). Now Telecom has tied up with TiVo as the sole distributor in New Zealand Sky has had to play catch up, their response iSky. First impressions, given that the full service isn't launched yet, are good. Finally after years of me seeing other countries extending TV into the computer world with the likes of Yahoo -> TiVo