Skip to main content

Muni, Muni, Muni

2006 is going to see an explosion in the activity of Municipal, Muni, Networks.

This article from the BBC states that IP access is becoming a basic amenity, in the same way as water and electricity.

Philly is the next to be online; with a 135 square mile network being built out by Earthlink and turned on next year. Not far behind is San Francisco with, you've guessed it, Google as one of the prime bidders. They believe they can take their successful advertising revenue stream to provide free IP access to the proletariat.

On a brief aside the partnership of Google and NASA, can we expect to see Google in Space?

With the benefits of WiFi access to schools, hospitals and police forces around the US it won't take long for a few well publicized examples of how access helped them for the ball to start rolling.

I would agree with Paul that the secret to success is a partnership with the existing carriers. Otherwise the likes of SprintNextel could easily freeze the new comers out.

The recent disruptions in connectivity of old cable and fiber networks caused by Katrina showed the real benefits of WiFi networks, allowing emergency services to be connected.

At the forefront is Austin, Texas. They already have a well established Municipal Network and people are getting plugged into the Austin Wireless ideal. There are even free hotspots here in Bangkok of all places that you can find by accessing through the Austin Wireless website.

Once SF City gets its Muni Net laid down I think that some of the next cities will be Seattle, Dallas/Fort Worth and Las Vegas. Simply because of the residents of the first two, high tech industry, and the explosive growth of the last will mean they are ideal candidates for wireless connectivity.

Hell if Oregon state can do it what's to stop the rest of us?

Comments

Paul Jardine said…
David, I think what I was trying to say was that Telcos should be embracing the idea of muni-nets in order to sell services on top of them.
I am starting to think that nearly all operators have missed the content boat and they need to look to access as their only business. It's not a bad business to be in, if you don't have a whole lot of old equipment and staff to maintain. Doh! as Homer would say.

Popular posts from this blog

Thailand's long evolution to Long Term Evolution - the 4G Saga

While much of the world, including some countries that Thailand thinks of as less technologically advanced, are reaping the benefits of 4G; Thailand has yet to get beyond the dabbling stage and jump in with both feet. It seemed to take an eternity to get on to 3G and at least one operator has made the jump to 4G trials.  Now the local regulator has finally (re)set the date for the long awaited auction of the spectrum and details are set to be announced in February. Normally I would be a strong supporter of a free market and all that a regulated market should bring in the way of competition, and therefore when market forces kick in what that then means for consumers in terms of value for money.  However, in this case I am wondering if there is a different answer to the problem. Having watched the mast alliances in Europe and regulator interventions in New Zealand and Australia I think that the antiquated Build, Operate, Transfer (BOT) agreements that Thai mobile opera...

Technology Applied - Compact Calendar

David Seah and his very well put together Printable CEO Series has shared his compact calendar for 2008. There are many country specific versions available from his site and his readers. I have modified the data for Thailand for 2008 . Take the time to have a look around his site, it's well worth the time.

WhyMax? what is the business case and/or killer app...

The most hyped, most promising technology to really be tested gets another push from the Rupe. Rupert Murdoch is looking for life after (or during) satellite and he seems to think that TV over WiMax is it. It leads to an interesting discussion that is still ongoing, what is the business case for 802.16? Not surprisingly many people are still convinced that VoIP or VoWLAN will be the real use for the technology. This is because of the super-sized cell that potentially can be created, the super-hotspot could be a real challenger for GSM and CDMA due to the typical usage habits of the average subscriber. So with that said do we already have the killer application for WiMax. Skype was an early disruptor to voice reveune and it's portability across many platforms does it make the ideal choice for the VoIP application. Gizmo is also a strong candidate for me, it has already been trialled on GoogleNet in Mountain View by Team OM , and I like the fact that it does run on the Nokia 7...