Skip to main content

Why Simple is best



In the move to New Zealand we decided to keep one of the mobile numbers here. The operator, DTAC, has been quite creative with options to retain the number at minimal cost.

The first plan they offered was zero monthly charge and to retain the number you have to keep the account active with at least one transaction every 90 days. Not a bad plan if you were going away for three months or less. However we won't be back until August at the earliest.

After describing the problem in the outlet the CSR suggested to transfer the number to pre-paid. This is the best model for convergence for me allowing me post-paid functions with pre-paid as a payment method. It seems that this operator is starting to understand the pre or post is no more than a choice on how I wish to pay, the services should not be differentiated based on service line, good news.

This pre-paid package, called Simple, allows you to keep your balance and your number active for one year, that's 365 days. Sounded promising so the change was made and the IN rolled out the updates over the next three hours.

Then it all broke down. The reason why telcos should always keep their plans simple
in nature and not just in name is that the human factor of the CSR in the call centre will always let you down.

First contact was to ask about top up options. The corporate website has some useful information but with four separate tables showing various versions of charge rates, top up amounts and expiry periods the effort is lost in a confusing over supply of information. So the call to the contact centre is made.

The usual problem of CSR's is that they typically don't have enough information to the helpful, they work hard but get nowhere. We ended up educating said CSR on the core principles of the plan and asked again on top up options using online banking. The poor CSR was let confused and unable to answer to we asked them to check and get back to us.

You can fault the service mentally, they went away did their homework and dutifully called back to talk through the steps.

Now that the balance has been topped up the confirmation SMS arrives saying that the balance will expire on 14 February 2008. That is 45 days, 320 days short of what the plan states should happen.

Back on to the call centre to ask what is happening, why the balance will expire so quickly. This new CSR explains that you will receive a new SMS within 24 hours showing that your expiry date has been extended to the full year, thanks for phoning the call centre you've been charged 3 baht.

After all the hard work in the promotion design, the rep in the outlet, the first CSR that did their best and phoned back, now the customer is very unhappy because they have had to phone the call centre again to get conformation and been charged for the privilege.

This is why robots and IVR will always be better than CSR's. If plans become too complex and the CSR's are not trained properly all of the hard work in generating a good customer experience is thrown away. All because the first CSR did not have enough information to answer the question fully the first time around.

The subscriber is charged for two calls to a call centre that should be able to be handled in a single inbound call. A cynical mind would ask if this is a plan to generate additional revenue from the call centre. Forget customer satisfaction, keep them calling in repeatedly and charge them every time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crisis Connections

What the flood situation in Thailand has shown once again is the power of social networks to fill the void of communication. In recent times the role of Facebook, Twitter, and Blackberry messenger has been shown in good and bad light.  The same methods that released the Arab Spring have also been used to coordinate the London Riots . Love them or loathe social networks are here to stay and what the floods show is how they keep people connected.  Some will say there should be no communication void if central government is on top of its game, but with a situation that can change so rapidly, and over such a large area the traditional press certainly struggle to keep the public up to date. Twitter and Facebook have been saviours for those of us outside Thailand at this time.  With roving reporters and connected people like Patee Sarasin and Jetrin out doing and tweeting many more people are kept up to date. Equally useful is the ability to time shift news updates...

Voice puts the pinch on Content

Content providers in Thailand are struggling to stay afloat after a restructuring of the revenue sharing between the mobile operators and themselves. Firms like Advanced Info Service (AIS) have been offering content on their 2.5G networks here for sometime. This has spawned a number of content partners to spring up. The previous arrangement were of the order of 65% to 80%. The new arrangement sets a 50:50 split of the revenue between proivder and operator. The operators say that this is due to the operating costs of their networks and that up to now this has been a trial offering. It smells more like a knee jerk reaction to falling revenues from voice. When will the market wake up and realize that paying for voice is dead. The secret to the success of operators going forward will be in the successful channeling of content, where voice is but another type of content. This is a worrying trend. If the pinch continues then I see that most of the content partners will not survive long. This...

SKY New Zealand vaults into the 21st Century

New Zealand is a pretty country but it's also pretty slow in coming forward in many areas. It has it fair share of innovation but some parts of everyday life are still if not 20 years behind but at least 10...until now. Sky in the UK has made use of user driven options through handset interaction for some time, push the red button, Sky NZ still does not support this type of service. But this is where competition shows its value, it forces natural monopolies to innovate, and let's be honest Sky TV is a natural monopoly here by being the only digital TV service (which you have to use if you want to get a decent reception so Freeview doesn't count [yet]). Now Telecom has tied up with TiVo as the sole distributor in New Zealand Sky has had to play catch up, their response iSky. First impressions, given that the full service isn't launched yet, are good. Finally after years of me seeing other countries extending TV into the computer world with the likes of Yahoo -> TiVo ...