Skip to main content

UMA and WiMax.. a dream or reality

UMA, Unlicensed Mobile Access, will be the next big feature of handsets you will but from 2006 onwards.

What is it? Why will it be big?

UMA is a technology that allows the hand-over of a voice call from GSM to WiFi and back. This means that you will be talking on a GSM service and then be moved to a wireless LAN, in a hotel, office building or airport.

It has already started, as Geoff Long wrote in Telecom Asia, but at present is slow to pick up.

Here in Thailand it will probably be a way off, as the No 1 Yuppiephone operator is likely to suppress it until it has supporting technology in place. DTAC would more likely be early adopters as they see the benefits in partnering and packaging such services together.

One of the limitations, due to unknowns, is the current WiFi (802.11) standard. Nobody really knows how well this will scale an the limited range of the wireless access points further serves to limit the success of a UMA, WiFi solution.

However WiFi's big brother WiMax has far superior range and bandwidth. The newest 802.16 standard (e) includes Scalable orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access, or the nicer SOFDMA, which will help with scalability issues required for large voice usage.

There are planned WiMax trials in Chiang Mai, Nakhon Ratchasima and Roi Et before the end of the year.

So you've got the basic technology in place but how do you get to it. If you are a PDA user then you could use the quad band, WiFi and UMA supported BenQ P50, or you can adopt one of the first dual mode phones.; the LG CL400. It's probably worth waiting for Nokia et al to catch up. There is already a desire in their domestic market to fill the need for dual mode phones as previously posted here following an item in TeleGeography.

But why are the phone producers so keen on the UMA operations of their handsets? they either see UMA and Voice over WiFi as a risk and they want to be able to still meet the consumer need or they are using it as a threat to the mobile operators, one vision of a possible future.

Either way it will be the status quo. Those who [potentially] have the most to lose, the mobile operators, already have the basic infrastructure to support 802.16 so they will most likely grab the market share.

In the WiFi world there are already lots of vendors in the access provision space and in real terms how many more can enter before the sector fragments too much to make Voice over WiFi unviable. One solution is WiFi roaming agreements the other is super operators. iPass already maintain a layer to hotspots in many countries, mostly airports and hotels. This is one solution unless the China Netcom model takes up well amongst the other players.

In that case aren't we just swapping one roaming animal with another?

Things will start to steady themselves around the early second half of next year. There will be issues to iron out around quality of service and access but early leaders in Singapore and elsewhere will drive these through if the desire is there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In the overlap of technology, marketing and social media the QR Code is critical

Outside of consulting on telecommunications, CIO advisory, and the business adoption of technology I also completed an MBA.  One of the projects was on the potential use cases of two dimensional barcodes. Today the QR Code , one of many types of 2D codes, is seen as being a critical component of any good marketing plan.  As a natural integration between social media and devices I would extend VMob Bob's question " What can a mobile operator learn from Facebook ?" and also ask how can they step and start to make innovations with the extensions to social media that already exist today?

Access as infrastructure, what does this mean for Telco 2.0?

Having recently attended a seminar by Catherine Middleton from Ryerson on Australia's NBN initiative it got me thinking about "access as infrastructure". The Australian Government is investing $B's of public and private capital in a national broadband network that is a fibre to the premise platform, although for distant and remote sites it will most likely be a fixed wireless solution.  The proposition from Dr. Middleton is that ubiquitous access will create a platform for services that separates competition from access, sounds like Telco 2.0. The question I posed was if the idea is a common platform but close to 10% of that access will be at 12Mbps rather than 100Mbps (fixed wireless versus fibre) then surely the lowest common denominator will prevail and services will be designed for 12Mbps.  You would then question the rationale of FTTP or FTTH when you could go fixed wireless.  Over time LTE and similar technologies will see an increase in speed that will of...

A Phone or a Swiss Army Knife?

It's getting to that time when I should start looking for my new handset. I choose the word carefully as today you are very lucky to find just a phone. Most handsets today are either a phone and media player, a phone and a camera (sometimes video), a phone and a PDA the list of combinations goes on and on. Now this might be great in the marketing room "what can we do next?" but the point that is lost on many of the manufacturers is this; people want a phone first the rest is secondary. Many of the hybrid handsets look good, can have great MP3 playback but suffer in size, ease of use of the main function (phone calls) or have poor battery life because of all the other gadgets hanging off of it. It's very similar to the Swiss Army Knife, the knife is often too small to be used for much over opening your letters, the screwdriver is hard to use because the size of the body means you can't get to a lot of the screws on objects, the pliers have little leverage because t...