Skip to main content

Bay me, Pay me, Say me

I've stayed quiet on the eBay purchase of Skype until the dust settles a little bit.

I have to say I still don't understand the logic behind the purchase. Skype was on the bleeding edge but had begun to lose focus, the more recent updates were fuzzy and didn't really bring any additional value to the product.

In hindsight you might say that the offering was already attractive to a buyer so why bother. The momentum will now shift to Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to finish what Skype started and leverage the presence aspect with tangible business benefit.

So why did eBay step up and pay out?

One statement suggests that it was a way to break in to untapped markets, South East Asia and China. An area where eBay has not really been successful.

It would appear that the plan was to piggy back off of Skype usage and expand the foot print of services offered, this would include PayPal. In the recent past I have tried to create a PayPal account here in Thailand. When I tired to do so Thailand as a country for account registration was not an option, US and Europe centric the choices were.

There is a more real stopper to the use of PayPal and eBay in the region and that is, with the exception of Singapore and Hong Kong, a distrust of any form of electronic money. Direct Debit is not widely accepted as a payment choice. Credit and Debit cards carry a standard 3.5% usage charge. Cash is King in the Land of Smiles, and elsewhere in the region.

Go to any bank at the end of the month and you will be faced with queues of people lining up to settle utilities and other bills (after queuing up to withdraw the cash from an ATM).

This is the problem that eBay needs to solve if it wishes to grow in this market space, buying a VoIP solution will not help massively, credibility of ePayment.

If the dream is to have one convenient platform where people can browse eBay, pay via PayPal and have a cheap phone call between seller and buyer, it might be some time before that dream is realised.

And what will happen to Skype now? which parts of the roadmap that others would like to see will evolve? or will the usual suspects surge and fill the gaps.

I anticipate the latter rather then the former.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PC over IP - The Teradici Effect

Teradici are hoping to blur the lines between PC and Data Centre. Their solution allows a use to view multiple screens and control the blade PC over IP. This is kind of like the dumb terminals with a new edgy deployment. The intention is that all of the computing power is performed offsite in a centralized area, the Data Centre, and this will save on power and maintenance costs as the engineers are co-located with the hardware and therefore don't have to go out to the client site for basic maintenance. The Teradici Company Article found in the Wall Street Journal
Post a Comment
Read more

In the overlap of technology, marketing and social media the QR Code is critical

Outside of consulting on telecommunications, CIO advisory, and the business adoption of technology I also completed an MBA.  One of the projects was on the potential use cases of two dimensional barcodes. Today the QR Code , one of many types of 2D codes, is seen as being a critical component of any good marketing plan.  As a natural integration between social media and devices I would extend VMob Bob's question " What can a mobile operator learn from Facebook ?" and also ask how can they step and start to make innovations with the extensions to social media that already exist today?
Post a Comment
Read more

Access as infrastructure, what does this mean for Telco 2.0?

Having recently attended a seminar by Catherine Middleton from Ryerson on Australia's NBN initiative it got me thinking about "access as infrastructure". The Australian Government is investing $B's of public and private capital in a national broadband network that is a fibre to the premise platform, although for distant and remote sites it will most likely be a fixed wireless solution.  The proposition from Dr. Middleton is that ubiquitous access will create a platform for services that separates competition from access, sounds like Telco 2.0. The question I posed was if the idea is a common platform but close to 10% of that access will be at 12Mbps rather than 100Mbps (fixed wireless versus fibre) then surely the lowest common denominator will prevail and services will be designed for 12Mbps.  You would then question the rationale of FTTP or FTTH when you could go fixed wireless.  Over time LTE and similar technologies will see an increase in speed that will of...
Post a Comment
Read more